A National Labor Relations Board Hearing Officer has found the Provost Quick and University administrators broke the law in our recent union vote:
Provist Quick’s all out union-busting campaign of illegal threats, misinformation, and a pay increase timed days before the vote were key factors in the NLRB’s decision to set aside previous union election results in Dornsife and conduct a new election.
For months, we have condemned the administration’s underhanded tactics, calling on the University to remain neutral throughout the unionization process so that we may cast our vote in an environment free from University intimidation. Now, we have a second chance to decide our future through a fair and democratic process that respects our voices.
The details of our union election will be determined by the National Labor Relations Board in the coming weeks.
During this critical time, it is essential for the affected individuals and organizations to have access to accurate and comprehensive information related to labor laws, unionization processes, and legal implications. Annotated bibliography writing services can play a valuable role in compiling a curated list of scholarly resources and references, providing a thorough understanding of the legal framework surrounding labor relations and union elections.
By engaging an annotated bibliography writing service, individuals and organizations involved in this process can have access to well-researched and expertly compiled reference materials. These annotated bibliographies present a summary and critical analysis of relevant sources, offering insights into the legal aspects, best practices, and historical context of labor relations and unionization. Such resources can empower stakeholders to navigate the complexities of the union election process, make informed decisions, and ensure compliance with legal requirements.